Should Yahoo have been forced to turn over Justin Ellsworth's email to Essay

Should chawbacon have been forced to turn over Justin Ellsworths email to his Parents - Essay illustrationThere is a view that the bumpkin management should have acted swiftly and handed over the email documents to the parents of the killed Marine soon after their asking without time lag for the court order. The argument that the Yahoo management should have been forced somehow to comply with the parents request without waiting for the court order does not stand logical system as it would have itself violated its own privacy agreement in such a case.In declining to accept the parents request, Yahoo went purely by the deontological intermit of the ethics while ignoring the utilitarian part. Utilitarian theory of the ethics requires people to take into consideration the resulting consequences of a particular action (Grunig & White, 1992) on the people or events involved. Yahoo knows better that a utilitarian approach would sometimes lead to problems despite its positive exits. Ya hoo must have carefully assessed the positive andHad Yahoo immediately handed over the email circumscribe to the parents when they asked, they would have certainly felt happy and satisfied on that count. This is certainly a positive effect when viewed from the parents angle but it would have also produced its negative consequences for the Yahoo Management. In such a case, the company would have violated its own privacy constitution of protecting the interests of its email users and attracted criticism. This was clear from the statement of the Yahoo spokeswoman Mary Osako who disclosed that they would abide by the court order and hand over the email contents to Justins parents indicating that they would never deviate from their well established privacy policy but would only act on the directions of a court of law (Chambers, 2005).Certainly, Yahoo followed the deontological theories of ethics which emphasize adherence to a stated policy and commitment to rules and regulations. The l ogic of the deontological